Interesting incident on the way in to work today. I had the
misfortune to be walking in just before nine. Misfortune because all the
students are making their way to their first lectures of the day at this time
and they literally take over. Fill up the entire pavement by walking in large
groups. Whizz along the road on bikes, skipping red lights and almost causing
accidents left, right and centre.
Anyway, I was walking along next to one such large group
when one of the young men piped up with ‘What does “panache” mean?...Only I
want to be able to describe myself that way.' Sounds a bit risky, if you ask me,
wanting to describe yourself with a word for which you don’t know the meaning.
But the really interesting thing was that not one of his colleagues was able to
answer his question. I helpfully obliged, which was met with thanks and
comments along the lines of ‘Oh, so that’s
what it means!’, rolled around on the tongue as if discovering a new and
interesting vintage.
Now, this was a group of Oxford University students. It is
natural to assume that such people will be bright, be educated and, quite
frankly, know the meaning of a word
such as ‘panache’. I could settle for one student in the group not knowing the
meaning—but all of them? Come on!
And it’s not the first time that I’ve come across this kind
of deficit. I work with a group of Oxbridge-educated postdocs who frequently
don’t seem to know the meaning of words that I would consider commonplace. They
also seem to lack the ability to spell.
So why is this? Is it that these people are scientists and
so don’t have a bent for language? Language is my first love and I read and
write all the time, so it makes sense that I have a wide vocabulary and know
how to spell. Or is it an age thing? Perhaps young people aren’t taught English
in the way that I was back in the 70s and 80s. Yet both my children are good
writers, can spell, and seem to me to have large vocabularies (they are both
voracious readers). Or maybe it’s genetic—my father was a writer, I am a
writer, and my children appear to be following the family tradition.
Call me old fashioned (and, believe me, I often feel old
fashioned when writing my blog articles!), but I think that the whole language
package (writing, spelling, words) is undervalued and has become increasingly
undervalued in the years since I was a child. You only have to look at the UK higher
education landscape these days to realise that the areas most strongly
supported and funded are the sciences (particularly those perceived as leading
to human health benefits) and vocational subjects. Education no longer appears
to be valued for its own sake, which means that the humanities in general are
being systematically eroded. And it tends
to be in the humanities that language—the ability to communicate, to express
oneself well in writing, to be vividly descriptive as well as analytic—really
thrives.
No comments:
Post a Comment